Why Stop at Multicultural? Let’s Go All the Way
You may have heard the joke that goes like this: There are two types of people in the world, those who divide people into two types and those that don’t. One of the world’s smartest people, Steven J. Gould, wrote about humanity’s disturbing trait of dividing things into two’s. That makes it easier to say that someone is for us or against us. This dualism adds to our dueling.
It also prevents us from seeing solutions to our problems. In local school districts, it’s either whole language or phonics (in reality, just about any reading program has both). In politics it’s liberal versus conservative. In Washington, DC politics, it’s black versus white. In the Bible belt, one finds Christians versus anyone who isn’t.
Talk radio stations love the liberal-conservative noise. You can’t find a let’s-get-along station. The country isn’t served by this. When pressed on his liberal credentials, then-President Clinton said, “that dog won’t hunt anymore.” Like him or hate him. his effort to blur the distinction might have merit.
Around the Internet there is a campaign to paint the world as a coming battleground. The Muslims are coming and coming fast! Soon they will take over Europe, then Islamify the US. Then won’t Christians who ignored all the signs be sorry!
In matters of race, we have issues, but we show progress. The quiet progress comes from interracial marriages and mixed race neighborhoods. Moreover, it comes from mixed race people. Tiger Woods signaled by his notoriety a change in our concept of race. Black/white distinctions are being blurred by the idea of multi-racial.
Our true selves as Americans show up not as blots of black, white and other, but as a mix. If Tiger by virtue of his parentage is cool, having a mixed-race president is way cool.
Religious distinctions, products of our minds and not physical characteristics, should be easily bridgeable. But we insist on exclusivity. Maybe it’s time for make it cool to be multi-religious. Mike Mansfield in his book The Japanese Mind describes how the Japanese can be, with no internal contradictions and no social discomfort, be of several beliefs. They may be Christian, Buddhist, and Shinto at the same time, choosing rituals from each, as they deem fit.
And why not? Why can’t I choose a theology drawing on the Wisdom of Solomon and David, the meditative awareness of the Buddha, the poetry of the Quran, and the humility of Jesus? Religion at its best creates community, and our diverse society is rich in the wisdom of the ages.
Yet we feel we must choose one and only one.
I know someone whose wife is a Muslim Moroccan who followed her white, Christian husband to the US from Spain. She believes in celebrating everyone’s holidays. She enjoys St Patrick’s Day with the relish of the Irish, Christmas with the sense of joy experienced by Christians, and Eid with the reverence of her own faith.
But that we all could embrace such an outlook. But we seem stuck in our dualist nature. Pro-com. Go-no-go. We argue to argue. We can, however, be more than the residue of our little philosophical encampments.
I admit there are limitations. One cannot, for example, be both a Dodgers and Giants fan. That would be silly.